Internet baffled by father’s trust fund rule on son

Thousands of online commentators were left in conflict after a father revealed the only condition he must meet before he releases part of his eldest son’s trust fund.

in viral form reddit Post posted on r/AmITheA**hole, Redditor u/Critical_Value1511 (otherwise referred to as the original poster or OP) said his son had recently been engaged but explained his doubts about his future daughter-in-law’s finances.

entitled “[Am I the a**hole] For not giving my son a portion of his trust early because he refuses to sign a pre-contract with his fiancée? ” Mail It has garnered nearly 8000 votes and 2700 comments in the last 10 hours.

The original poster wrote that he had four children, all of whom would have big credit when they turned 30, and asserted that he was “very proud” of his children and the careers they pursued. Though, the original poster also said he was skeptical about his son’s engagement.

“[My son] Recently got engaged to his girlfriend [two] years and want to get married by the end of this year,” OP wrote.[His fiancée] It looks cute. However, she doesn’t earn as much as him.”

“My son spends a lot of money on it, on dates and expensive gifts,” the OP continued. “I understand that this is his money and he can spend it however he wants [but] I also moved to live with him in the apartment I gave him, and as far as I know, she doesn’t pay her share of utilities and association fees.”

To pay for the couple’s wedding, the original poster said his son asked for a portion of his trust early. Original Label Approved – Based on one key condition.

“This is where I might be the hole,” O.P. wrote. “I told him I would release a portion of his trust early if he made a prenup.”

“I told him it didn’t seem safe to use his money at a wedding for a girl who ‘don’t bring too much on the table,'” the OP continued.

Or added.

ten years ago, Harvard Gazette She reported that a small percentage (between 5 and 10) of American couples enter into prenuptial agreements before marriage.

But lately, that number has skyrocketed, thanks in large part to forward-looking millennials.

In 2019, a survey conducted by the American Academy of Marriage Lawyers (via interested in trade) a 62 percent increase in prenuptial agreements, 51 percent of which were signed by millennial couples.

Despite talks about prenuptial agreements, which force couples to acknowledge the possibility of divorce before saying “I do,” It can be controversiallegal experts assert that they provide protection and financial clarity to both partners.

Sandy K. said: Roxas, a California-based family law litigator, said, “The pre-compile discussion forces the partners to communicate their financial goals, their general attitudes about money, their spending and saving habits, and any outstanding debts.” Brides.com.

“Since financial issues are one of the The main reasons for divorceHaving these conversations before marriage can help build the foundation for a stronger, long-term union.”

The argument of the father and the eldest son
Members of the forum r/AmITheA** ripped their Reddit hole after a father explained why he was reluctant to release a portion of his son’s trust fund to fund his wedding.
PhysX/iStock/Getty Images Plus

During the comments section of the viral Reddit post, Redditors echoed that sentiment and agreed with the original publisher’s reasoning that A prenuptial agreement would provide a layer of financial security for his son.

His statement about his future daughter-in-law is no.[bringing] So much on the table,” however, it was not something the commentators could stand behind.

Redditor u/lihzee wrote in the top comment to the post, which has received over 17,500 votes.

“But I think [you’re the a**hole] For saying his fiancée “doesn’t bring much to the table,” she “continued.” “Why do you feel this way about her? Just because she makes less money than your son?”

Redditor u/ErisianImpulse, whose comment got nearly 9,000 votes, provided a similar response.

“You’re insinuating that his fiancée is a gold prospector,” they wrote. “I’m definitely aware of how much protection prenuptial can give your son. I think it’s a wise idea, and it looks like you got it wrong.”

“You are not wrong, but [you’re the a**hole] For being insensitive and arrogant in your explanation of why.”

In a separate comment, which has garnered more than 2,000 votes, Redditor u/Cartwright_James warned the original poster that his premarital status could have lasting effects after the wedding day.

“Unless there is a really compelling reason to believe it [your son’s] His fiancée is not trustworthy, is that really a wise move? “They wondered” you could really hurt your relationship with your son by saying what you said. “

NEWSWEEK u/Critical_Value1511 has been reached for comment.