Simpler software testing is needed because native developers who use low code development techniques are not willing to wait for IT to be logged out.
There is a universally recognized truth in software development: testing makes the final product better, speeds up the development lifecycle, and reduces technical debt (in time and cost) over time. But the more common truth is that software testing becomes an afterthought due to the need to deploy faster and massive pressure to keep the digital transformation in motion.
This equation will become increasingly difficult for organizations to juggle low-code/no-code applications that are popular among native developers who just want to get a specific task done without having to consult with their IT department. Low / no code applications should also be tested.
Who will manually test all these new apps? Who will write scripts or build integrations with the CI/CD pipeline to create consistent and measurable test coverage? Who will make sure that this software works properly, is stable, available and creates a good customer experience?
The answer to this abundance of low-code apps may just be low-code test pads.
Many organizations still use “traditional” software testing methods, which are generally equivalent to manual testing or scripts. Manual testing is often as simple as a team of citizen developers examining their new low code app until they find an extreme case where it breaks – time consuming and not particularly accurate. With the script, developers can automate the process of trying a particular action and return a pass/fail result depending on the result, but without automating, these are just more steps in an already fraught process.
There are some major problems with this current situation:
- Low-code applications often fail to comply with an organization’s data compliance and security guidelines.
- Low-code applications create technical debts that are more expensive to fix after they are first deployed.
- Low-code applications are completely isolated from the IT stack or use untested integrations that may lead to data loss.
These shortcomings are exactly what many organizations advocate for IT Supervision aver Low code applications, but no one has the time to implement more manual reviews or scripts. in their efforts to get things doneCitizen developers do not want to wait for IT to log out and will continue to experiment with new and innovative ways to extract and combine existing data from multiple sources to gain new insights.
comprehensive Forrester report In low code testing, organizations suggest you start with unit, component, and functional testing.
- unit tests Check if the developer code is doing what it wants on the smallest scale. This means testing each module within an application independently to ensure that it works correctly in isolation, which means that there are no interactions with the application’s dependencies. Developers should create unit tests as they work, and there will be more unit tests than any other type.
- Ingredients Tests Validate the behavior, performance, and compliance of a larger cross-section of the application. It’s a kind of “black box” test where the test team doesn’t understand how the software is designed – their only concern is whether this cross-section of the application works as expected.
- Functional tests Examining the application from the user’s perspective – is the application behaving the way they expect? These tests often involve many approaches and likely include dependencies, such as fetching data from a database to check the most common workflow (often identified in user stories) needed to consider the application successful.
The end goal? A workflow dedicated to comprehensive testing of all low-code applications, using low-code testing platforms that reduce the number of errors in production, save costs and resources from rework and debugging, reduce risk around failed integrations, and ride out the rising tide of technical debt. In the meantime, IT teams can empower their citizen developers with testing tools that are just as easy to use as the low-code apps they use in the first place.
The number of low-code testing platforms is growing alongside the same low-code application development platforms. PreflightAnd ParasoftAnd certificateAnd kobetonAnd mapleAnd And Works These are just a few of the options available to citizen developers and their IT friends who are looking for a better solution.
What kind of results are possible with low code testing tools? According to a survey of Cubadowhich creates low-code testing tools for Salesforce organizations, and teams using the automated test version are 50% more frequent than those relying on manual testing and 50% more likely to complete all of their testing plans for each release.
And in this new age of low-code/no-code platforms, reducing reliance on manual coverage may seem like a temporary hiatus, but it’s a powerful new way to reintroduce proper validations without slowing down citizen developers who demand freedom to build special features — and their failures.