Queen Elizabeth’s platinum jubilee may be Britain’s last

The third mega Celebrating the extended reign of Queen Elizabeth II Held by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the North Island for the past 30 years, it began on Thursday. It’s set to be a great jubilee—that is, if you’re a fan of that sort of thing.

Elizabeth’s silver jubilee in 1977, which marks 25 years on the throne, was the first major anniversary event for a British queen since her grandfather, George V, celebrated his silver jubilee in 1935. The 60th anniversary of her coronation was the first since Queen Victoria became Empress of the territories It stretched from the North Atlantic to the Indian Ocean. There she has Not before the platinum jubilee In the United Kingdom, where she was neither king nor queen before her 70-year reign.

Nor is it likely that the rule of any king will transcend it. The four-day celebration that began on Thursday may eventually be the last jubilee the kingdom holds in my lifetime. And we have to consider the possibility that there will be no kingdom for much longer after the passing of the crown from Elizabeth to her son Prince Charles, which means this jubilee could also be the last the UK has ever held.

The concentrated power of the British Crown began to diminish in the nineteenth century, and continued to decline during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. Under the unwritten British constitution, all executive and judicial powers still flow through it and are carried out in its name, but in practice it is Parliament, not the Privy Council, which Makes and enforces laws.

Even when the leader of the majority party goes to the queen Permission to form a government, it is a formality ; There was no example of her refusing this request. After the passage of the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act in 2011, it no longer had the power to dissolve parliaments at will, one of the greatest powers the Crown has been able to retain. In 2019, when Prime Minister Boris Johnson attempted to suspend Parliament, observers were left wondering Whether Elizabeth can fire him You should choose it.

We have to consider the possibility that there won’t be a kingdom for much longer after the passing of the crown from Elizabeth to her son, Prince Charles.

Since Elizabeth became queen in 1952, the British Empire disintegrated when colonial nations gained their independence. While the head of state is still in 14 Commonwealth countriesThis arrangement is not guaranteed to last forever. As it stands, its role is a fictitious one, a symbol, which has no real role in governing the countries that Show her face on her coin.

However, Elizabeth is still very popular among her remaining subjects – this is not necessarily the case for the rest of the royal family, According to a YouGov poll. The Queen is viewed positively by 81 per cent of the 1,692 British adults who asked for their opinion, while only 12 per cent expressed a negative attitude towards her. Meanwhile, 58 percent of people recently surveyed have a positive opinion of Charles – but 37 percent view the heir to the throne negatively. His son, Prince William, fared better with 77 percent of those surveyed seeing his vision in a positive light, but he still pales in comparison to Elizabeth.

Meanwhile, another YouGov استطلاع survey found Supporting Ownership as an Institution slips, especially among young adults. Elizabeth may be the last British monarch to gain her level of popular support. Declining support for the monarchy may provide the opportunity for a reform-oriented Parliament to completely remove the Crown from the flow of power.

But actuarial schedules pose an even greater threat to future jubilees. If Charles ever ascends the throne, odds are long that he will see a Silver Jubilee. If Charles stepped up this year and was crowned at the age of 73, he would have been 98 before such a celebration happened. (on condition His father Prince Philip lived until the age of 99It doesn’t seem impossible.)

There is, of course, a chance that Charles will allow the crown to pass to William, bypassing his birthright. This would give William a longer chance to rule, but history doesn’t exactly give many examples of this kind of paternalistic selflessness, not when it comes to royalty. We then face the question of whether the monarchy, which has withstood even as many other European thrones have been overthrown or left by the wayside, will see its last coronation before William’s son, Prince George, takes his turn. to be consecrated in Westminster Abbey.

Actuarial schedules pose an even greater threat to future jubilees.

Regardless of which path the succession takes, Elizabeth’s prolonged rule means that all of the closest heirs to the throne are much older than they were when she was coronated at the age of 26, making silver, gold, and diamond jubilees seem out of reach. In any case, the British will not celebrate another jubilee in decades. If this is the last time we see Brits wearing such a spectacle, so be it. I wouldn’t cry if these lingering remnants of a bygone era of kings and empire faded into oblivion.

But it is entirely possible that, given the almost 1,000-year continual span of monarchy (except for a photoperiod led by Oliver Cromwell in the seventeenth century), the United Kingdom is moving forward with its devotion to future kings undiminished. That’s entirely up to them – which is ridiculous in a sense.

Through inertia and a common veneration of tradition, the people of Great Britain may end up allowing their undemocratic heads to stay where they are. Perhaps enough Britons will look back fondly at Halabalu this weekend and hope for another monarch to stare at them from the balcony at Buckingham Palace. Nostalgia may end up holding more power over the British people than the Crown itself.